...adhesion and migration of activated B lymphocytes to...
Myo1g is required for efficient adhesion and migration of activated B lymphocytes to inguinal lymph nodes AbstractCell migration is a dynamic process that involves adhesion molecules and the deformation of the moving cell that depends on cytoskeletal remodeling and actin-modulating proteins such as myosins. In this work, we analyzed the role of the class I Myosin-1聽g (Myo1g) in migratory processes of LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocytes in vivo and in vitro. In vivo, the absence of Myo1g reduced homing of activated B lymphocytes into the inguinal lymph node. Using microchannel chambers and morphology analysis, we found that the lack of Myo1g caused adhesion and chemotaxis defects. Additionally, deficiency in Myo1g causes flaws in adopting a migratory morphology. Our results highlight the importance of Myo1g during B cell migration. IntroductionB lymphocytes circulate in the blood, lymph, and secondary lymphoid organs, including the spleen and lymph nodes1, 2. B lymphocytes bind to and then transmigrate through specialized blood venules known as high endothelial venules (HEV) to enter lymph nodes (LNs)2. Transmigration is a sequential process driven by the interaction between circulating B lymphocytes and HEV through several molecules, including chemokine receptors, selectins, and integrins2,3,4. Selectins regulate the capture and rolling of B lymphocytes on the endothelium, followed by firm adhesion mediated by integrins, and subsequent diapedesis across the wall of the HEV3. Different chemokines guide B lymphocytes and provide specificity during homing to LNs4. Chemokines are a family of proteins secreted by several cells that recruit immune cells to specific tissues3, 5.CXCL12, CXCL13, and CCL19/21 are cytokines that drive the homing of B lymphocytes. These chemokines are recognized by their specific receptors CXCR4, CXCR5, and CCR7, in the B lymphocyte membrane. It has been reported that chemokine receptors\' expression depends on the state of maturation of the B lymphocyte and homing stage6, 7. It has been suggested that each one plays a role within the B lymphocyte migration process8, 9. During migration, B lymphocytes change their morphology, which depends on the plasticity of the cell10,11,12. Among the factors that regulate cell plasticity, the interaction between the cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane is essential. Among the proteins regulating this association, myosins play an outstanding role12, 13. The myosin family includes class I and class II myosins14, 15. Class I myosins are proteins that can bind to both actin filaments and plasma membrane, thus regulating cellular functions that involve their interaction such as cell motility, cell shape control, sensory transduction, and vesicular trafficking13, 16. Myo1g is a class I myosin that is expressed in several immune cells, including resting and activated B lymphocytes17. Myo1g is known to regulate endocytosis and exocytosis of specific molecules; and adhesion to different substrates18,19,20,21. Myo1g-deficient activated B lymphocyteshave decreased membrane tension and reduced elasticity17. Thus, in this work, we analyzed the participation of Myo1g during chemotaxis and transmigration, both in vivo and in vitro. Our results demonstrate that Myo1g deficiency significantly reduces the transmigration of LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocytes into inguinal LNs. In vitro, Myo1g is essential for regulating surface expression of adhesion molecules and elasticity of activated B lymphocytes, allowing the correct formation of membrane projections and acquiring a migratory phenotype.ResultsThe absence of Myo1g in activated B lymphocytes reduces their ability to interact with the HEV endotheliumClass I myosins regulate various cellular functions16, such as endocytosis and exocytosis of specific molecules, mobilization of recycling vesicles, and membrane tension of lymphocytes17, 18, 21, 22. Although Myo1g has been studied in several B lymphocytes\' functions, its participation in the early stages of transmigration to secondary lymphoid organs has not been evaluated. In previous work, we observed that LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes had reduced migration in vitro and lower polarization of CXCR5 in the membrane17, 21. In mature B lymphocytes, the expression of CXCR5 and its function is conserved during the B lymphocyte homing to LNs2, 23. Thus, we analyzed whether Myo1g regulates LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocyte motility on the HEV by IVM of CXCL13-stimulated inguinal LNs. In Fig.1a,b, we show a schematic representation of HEV venules and their diameter. Activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes showed increased cell flux only through venules I and II compared to WT (Fig.1c,d). Of note, fewer activated B lymphocytes performed slow rolling in the absence of Myo1g with significant changes in venules II鈥揑V (Fig.1e). Those rolling Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes in venules II鈥揑V showed significantly higher rolling velocities than WT B lymphocytes (Fig.1f). Higher rolling velocities in these venules translated into less firm adhesion (Fig.1g) and reduced numbers of activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes that transmigrated into inguinal LNs (Fig.1h). This result agrees with what we previously reported that in the absence of Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> LPS + IL-4activated B lymphocytes reached lymph nodes less efficiently20, 21. Besides, in an in vitro model of CXCL12-dependent migration, activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes had a lower percentage of transmigration (Supplementary Figure S1), suggesting that the same migration defect in vivo could be present with other chemokines. Representative videos can be found as Supplementary Videos S2, S3.Figure 1The absence of Myo1g affects adhesion and rolling of activated B lymphocytes on high endothelial venules. (a) Representative diagram of the different HEVs and (b) measurement of the diameter of venules (from the narrow IV to wide I) in the WT host mice\'s inguinal lymph nodes. LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B cells (stained with Hoechst 33342) from WT or Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> mice were directly injected into the carotid artery of a WT mouse. One hour previously, the inguinal lymph node was injected with 100 渭l CXCL13 (25ng/ml). Measurements of B cell flux (frequency of leukocytes that pass through the postcapillary venules) for 1min (c) and 5min (d). (e) Quantification of the number of activated B cells from WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> mice, performing slow rolling (frequency of leukocytes with a rolling velocity less than 5渭m/s) in the different venules (IV to I) of an inguinal lymph node of a host WT mouse. (f) Measurements of rolling velocities (traveling time from venules IV to I) of activated B cells from WT and Myo1g-/- mice in the WT inguinal lymph node. (g) Quantification of adherent B cells in the different postcapillary venules after 45min. (h) Quantification of extravasated B cells at 45min. n鈥?鈥?. Data are presented as mean鈥壜扁€塻.d. *P鈥?lt;鈥?.05, **P鈥?lt;鈥?.01, ***P鈥?lt;鈥?.001.Full size imageB lymphocytes require Myo1g for the expression of specific adhesion molecules upon activationDue to the previous result and because the adhesion of B lymphocytes to the endothelium depends on the adhesion molecules, we decided to evaluate the surface expression of CD62L, LFA-1, and VLA-4 on WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes. Under basal conditions, we did not observe differences in the expression of these molecules. However, when we activated B cells with LPS and IL-4, Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes showed reduced expression of CD62L, LFA-1, and VLA-4 in comparison with WT B lymphocytes (Fig. 2a鈥揷). These results could explain the reduced adhesive interactions with the endothelium in HEV II, III, and IV observed in vivo (Fig.1). Interestingly, we did not observe differences in the expression of CXCR5, CXCR4 and CCR7 (Fig. 2d鈥揻) between resting and LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes, suggesting that Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B cells are in principle able to respond to CXCL13 gradient as well as other chemokines. Representative histograms can be found as Supplementary Figure S4.Figure 2Myo1g is necessary for the surface expression of adhesion molecules in activated B lymphocytes. Graphical representation of mean fluorescence intensity values of (a) LFA-1, (b) VLA-4, (c) CD62L, (d) CXCR5, (e) CXCR4, (f) CCR7 in resting and LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes (n鈥?鈥?). Data are presented as mean鈥壜扁€塻.d. *P鈥?lt;鈥?.05.Full size imageThe absence of Myo1g alters the 3D migratory behavior of activated B lymphocytesFor the evaluation of cell motility, there are 2D and 3D migration models. In both models, cells\' intrinsic factors participate, such as cell contractility, adhesion, and cytoskeleton rearrangements. Both models resemble conditions in vivo. However, 2D migration involves a process dependent on integrins and protrusion-adhesion-contraction. In contrast, in the case of 3D migration, a treadmilling effect has been seen where the actin flow is continuous24, 25. To analyze the motility of B lymphocytes in a confined microchannel, we used a custom-made microfluidic chamber. These devices, coated with ICAM-1 or Fibronectin, have been used to imaging lymphocytes 鈥渨alking鈥?through brief contacts with the microchannel walls during migration26. Microchannels connected two chambers with different widths (5, 10, and 15渭m), and CXCL13 was used as a chemoattractant to promote migration of cells from one chamber to the other (Fig.3a). We observed that displacement could be better observed in 10渭m wide channels, suggesting that 15渭m channels were too broad and 5渭m channels too narrow for cell displacement. When analyzing LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocytes that traveled through 10渭m microchannels, we observed that activated B lymphocytes \"walk\" interacting with the Fibronectin-coated microchannel walls, as reported for similar devices26, 27. When we analyzed activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes, we observed reduced contact with the microchannel walls, affecting their speed (Fig. 3b,c). Figure3d shows a series of representative time-lapse photographs of activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> and WT B lymphocytes displacement. In summary, these experiments indicated that Myo1g might function in controlling the interaction of activated B lymphocytes to the substrate for confinement-optimized motility. We observed similar behavior with CXCL12 as a chemoattractant (Supplementary Figure S5). Previous work has demonstrated that in the absence of Myo1g, T cells adhere less efficiently to ICAM-1 and migrate faster than WT T cells27, suggesting that the absence of Myo1g reduces the adhesive abilities of T and B lymphocytes. Similarly, the absence of Myo1g decreases the adhesion of B lymphocytes to other substrates20, 21. As a whole, these results could explain why we observed reduced adherence to HEV as well as lower transmigration of Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes shown in Fig.1. Representative videos can be found as Supplementary Videos S6, S7.Figure 3In the absence of Myo1g, activated B lymphocytes have altered motility in a confined 3D microchannel. (a) A general model of the microfluidic chamber. This device has 96 channels with gap widths of 5, 10, and 15渭m. Each channel is 150渭m long. Briefly, LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated WT or Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes are placed by gravity inside the chamber. Then, CXCL13 is applied on the opposite side. After that, migration isrecorded by time-lapse microscopy. (b) Time of contact (s) of activated WT or Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes with the 10渭m microchannel wall. (c) speed (渭m/s) of activated B lymphocytes moving through a 10渭m microchannel calculated while the cells were moving within the microchannel. (d) Representative still images showing displacement of the cells over time; (red arrows). Data are presented as mean鈥壜扁€塻.d. ****P鈥?lt;鈥?.0001.Full size imageActin cytoskeletal remodeling upon activation depends on Myo1gLamellipodia and filopodia favor the initial interaction between B cells and the endothelium. Furthermore, the B cells must adopt a migratory phenotype and perform spreading on the endothelial cells to increase the contact area before starting to migrate28. Besides, B lymphocytes must modify their morphology during chemotactic migration, allowing amoeboid-like movements. Myo1g is known to regulate actin cytoskeletal dynamics and the plasma membrane\'s elasticity, critically involved in cytoskeletal changes11, 20, 29, 30. Therefore, we analyzed the distribution of Myo1g under conditions that favor a migratory phenotype. We incubated LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocytes under a CXCL13 chemotactic gradient using a Zigmond chamber and analyzed migration for 30min. Figure4a shows how Myo1g accumulates at the leading edge of migrating activated B cells. Next, we evaluated whether the absence of Myo1g affected the B lymphocyte migratory phenotype. Representative photographs in Fig.4b show the morphology of activated WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes on Fibronectin or Poly-l-Lysine under the CXCL13 chemotactic gradient. Moreover, when we analyzed the number and length of membrane projections in WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes, we observed a lower number and length of membrane projections in activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes on both Fibronectin and Poly-l-Lysine substrates (Fig. 4c,d). To measure the cell\'s curvature, we used the length/width ratio (elliptic factor). An elliptic factor鈥?gt;鈥? indicates an elongated morphology, which is characteristic of a moving lymphoid cell. On Fibronectin-coated slides, activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes had a lower elliptical factor compared with activated WT B lymphocytes. Of note, no difference was observed on Poly-l-Lysine (Fig.4e). These results suggest that in the absence of Myo1g, activated B lymphocytes have a reduced ability to modify their cytoskeleton and adopt a migratory phenotype. The differences observed in the assays described above when Fibronectin or Poly-l-Lysine coated slides were used also suggestthe participation of integrins.Figure 4The absence of Myo1g affects the migratory phenotype of activated B lymphocytes. (a) Representative images (40鈥壝椻€塷bjective) of migrating LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated WT B cells in a CXCL13 gradient. Myo1g is polarized toward the leading edge (white arrows). (b) Representative images (63鈥壝椻€塷bjective) of activated WT or Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes migrating on Fibronectin or Poly-l-Lysine coated slides in a CXCL13 gradient 30min, followed by staining with TRITC-Phalloidin. Scale bars 5渭m. n鈥?鈥?. (c) Measurement of the number of membrane protrusions, (d) length of protrusions, and (e) elliptical factor of CXCL13-stimulated WT or Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes migrating on Fibronectin and Poly-l-Lysine coated slides. Data correspond to three independent experiments. Data are presented as mean鈥壜扁€塻.d. ****P鈥?lt;鈥?.0001.Full size imageLack of Myo1g affects the ability of B lymphocytes to form membrane projectionsBecause Myo1g has been shown to regulate membrane tension and thus form membrane projections31, we decided to evaluate the capacity to generate membrane projection in non-activatedand activated B lymphocytes. We activated B cells on coverslips coated with Fibronectin. Figure5a shows that both resting and LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> and WT B lymphocytes can generate filopodia-like structures. However, the number of membrane projections and their lengths were significantly lower in Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes in both conditions (Fig. 5b,c). Besides, evaluating curvature of B lymphocytes in both conditions using the elliptical factor, Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes had a lower index, suggesting rounder shape (Supplementary Figure S8). These results suggest that B lymphocytes have defects in cytoskeletal dynamics in the absence of Myo1g. As we also observed that Myo1g participates in regulating the surface expression of adhesion molecules such as CD62L, VLA-4, and LFA-1 (Fig. 2a鈥揷), these data may explain the reduced capacity of LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated Myo1g-deficient B lymphocytes to interact with the endothelium of HEV20.Figure 5Myo1g participates in the ability of B lymphocytes to generate membrane protrusions. (a) Representative images (63鈥壝椻€塷bjective) of non-activated or LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes incubated two hours on Fibronectin-covered coverslips. Cells were stained with Tritc-Phalloidin, and membrane protrusions are indicated with white arrows. Scale bars 5渭m. n鈥?鈥?. (b) The number of membrane protrusions and (c) their lengths were measured on at least 50 activated B lymphocytes of WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> mice in three independent experiments. They were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Data correspond to three independent experiments. Data are presented as mean鈥壜扁€塻.d. ****P鈥?lt;鈥?.0001.Full size imageDiscussionIn this work, we used an in vivo model to analyze the participation of Myo1g during the migration of activated B lymphocytes. We observed that in the absence of Myo1g, LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocytes had reduced capacity to interact with the endothelium of postcapillary venules II, III, and IV in inguinal LNs. The deficiency was manifested by increased rolling velocities and reduced adhesion and transmigration. In the absence of Myo1g, activated B lymphocytes reached fewer lymph nodes, indicating this myosin\'s relevance in B cells\' homing20, 21. We reported recently that another class 1 myosin (Myo1e) regulates adhesion and migration of B lymphocytes by mobilizing FAK and allowing the activation of the FAK-PI3K-Rac1 pathway32. Myo1e has an SH3 domain that allows for protein鈥損rotein interactions13, 16, 30, 32. However, Myo1g lacks an SH3 domain. Therefore, the mechanism by which Myo1e and Myo1g participate in the migration of B lymphocytes should be different. Myo1c, another short tail class I myosin present in B lymphocytes\' microvilli, takes part in B lymphocytes\' ability to modify their cytoskeleton33. These results suggest that although short-tailed class I myosins (such as Myo1c and Myo1g) lack an SH3 domain, they are relevant for the actin cytoskeleton\'s plasticity in B lymphocytes by a still poorly defined mechanism. We used microfluidic devices to characterize further activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes; these devices allowed us to analyze 3D migration in vitro26, 27. The results showed that activated Myo1g-deficient B lymphocytes moved faster within a 10渭m channel. Previous work has demonstrated that in the absence of Myo1g, T cells adhere less efficiently to ICAM-1 and migrate faster than WT T cells27, suggesting that the absence of Myo1g reduces the adhesive abilities of T and B lymphocytes. In 3D migration models, round morphology favors displacement, so activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes may move more easily. Another possibility in the 3D model is that activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes have reduced expression of VLA-4, a Fibronectin ligand, the substrate that covers our device. Then, the interaction could beweak allowing an increased speed in migration. However, VLA-4 is not the only Fibronectin\' receptor present on B lymphocytes, so other receptors should be evaluated to rule out their participation34. Similarly, the absence of Myo1g decreases the adhesion of B lymphocytes to other substrates20, 21. Myo1g also regulates the recycling of lipid raft-associated receptors21. Myo1g has a PH-like domain that allows it to interact with lipid rafts19, 22, and several adhesion molecules such as selectins, integrins are present in these lipid domains. Therefore, problems with mobilization or recycling could be associated with lower adhesion molecules\' expression in activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes. However, it remains to be investigated whether Myo1g can also regulate the signaling pathways promoting these adhesion molecules\' de novo expression. It has been observed that Myo1g regulates actin cytoskeletal dynamics and the elasticity of the plasma membrane. These factors favor the generation of lamellipodia and filopodia, which are critically involved in these processes11, 29. Our results showed that Myo1g is concentrated at the poles of the cells when adopting a migratory phenotype. During cell migration, the changes generated in the cytoskeleton require a force to be exerted on the membrane. This force is provided by actin filament dynamics, promoting cell shape modifications and forming membrane structures such as filopodia and lamellipodia10, 12, 35. These mechanical forces exerted on the membrane are regulated by the membrane\'s tension regulated by various proteins, including Myo1g14, 29, 36. In previous work, we reported that in the absence of Myo1g, LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocytes had decreased membrane tension17. In addition to regulating elasticity, membrane tension must control the strength between the cytoskeleton and adhesion molecules through a clutch that joins the actin filaments with the integrins10, 37, 38. Moreover, it has been reported that membrane tension acts through the PLD2鈥搈TORC2 pathway to inhibit actin nucleation via the WAVE2 complex. These molecules could also participate in the signaling that favors rearrangements in the cytoskeleton39,40,41. Therefore, we propose that when membrane tension of activated B lymphocytes is reduced (by the absence of Myo1g), the cells have less capacity to produce stable membrane structures to convert them into a migratory phenotype. In conclusion, here we present pieces of evidence about the role of Myo1g in regulating the adhesion of B lymphocytes to HEV, affecting the formation of membrane projections necessary for a migratory phenotype. Thus, the absence of Myo1g decreases B lymphocytes\' interaction with the endothelium, which, together with the lower expression of adhesion molecules, reduces activated B lymphocytes\' capacity to enter inguinal LNs.Additionally, in this work, we show evidence for the role of Myo1g in B lymphocyte migration in vitro and in vivo. Myo1g regulates activated B lymphocytes\' adhesion to the endothelium of HEV and membrane tension that affects the cell membrane\'s elasticity, the formation of membrane projections, and the acquisition of a migratory phenotype. Finally, our findings give information about how Myo1g regulates cytoskeleton rearrangements during the B lymphocyte CXCL13-dependent migration process. Though our in vivo model was focussed on LN homing, lymphocyte migration is a conserved process. Hence, the phenomenon triggered by the absence of Myo1g could be present when Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes migrates toward other sites, for example, Peyer\' Patches, where homing is CXCL13-dependent42. It will be interesting to analyze the functional effect of the activated Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> B lymphocytes\' irregular migration. In Fig.6, a schematic illustration is shown that combines the results of this work with previous reports about the function of Myo1g in murine B lymphocytes. In this way, a model is proposed in which Myo1g could regulate different functions during the migration of B lymphocytes to the inguinal lymph node.Figure 6The absence of Myo1g limits the ability of B lymphocytes to generate morphological changes during migration. Schematic illustration of the role of Myo1g during activated B lymphocytes migration. In absence of Myo1g activated B lymphocytes have alower capacity to exert changes in their morphology and lower surface expression of adhesion molecules. These changes increase their speed of movement, reducing the interaction between the B lymphocyte and the endothelium, directly affecting homing of B lymphocytes towards the inguinal lymph node. Created with BioRender.com.Full size imageMethodsMice8鈥?0weeks old female wild type or Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> C57BL/6J mice were used in all experiments. The mice were bred and maintained at the animal facility of Cinvestav-IPN (Mexico City, Mexico). The Animal Care and Use Committee of Cinvestav-IPN approved all experiments. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. In vivo methods were carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.Lymphocyte isolation and flow cytometrySplenic mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll-paque Plus (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) density gradient separation, and B220鈥?鈥塩ells were enriched by panning, using plastic dishes coated with 伪-Thy-1 monoclonal antibody ascites (NIM-R1) (Chayen and Parkhouse, 1982). For B-cell activation, 2鈥壝椻€?06 cells were incubated 48h at 37掳C, and 5% CO2 in 1ml RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Stimulation was induced by 48h incubation with LPS from Escherichia coli O55: B5 (20渭g/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) plus the addition of IL-4 (10 U/ml) (R D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). This methodology was carried out following a previously published protocol32. For immunostaining, the Fc receptors were blocked using 10% goat serum. Cell suspensions were washed with PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 0.01% NaN3 (PBA). One million cells were stained 15min using the antibodies described in the following section. After incubation, the cells were washed with PBA and fixed with 1% formaldehyde in PBS (0.5% albumin, 0.01%NaN3, 100ml PBS). Doublets were excluded by gating on FSC-H versus FSC-A, and the lymphocytes were identified by their scatter properties (FSC-A versus SSC-A). Compensation was performed using single-stained cells for each of the fluorochromes used. The cells were evaluated using a BD LSR Fortessa flow cytometer (Becton鈥揇ickinson, San Jose, CA) and analyzed using FlowJo v.10 software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). All experiments were performed according to proper flow cytometry guidelines (Cossarizza et al., 2017). This methodology was carried out following a previously published protocol32.Antibodies and reagentsThe antibodies used were: polyclonal IgG anti Myo1g, anti-B220/CD45R (clone RA3-6B2, BioLegend), anti-CD29 (clone hm B1-1, BioLegend), anti-LFA-1 (clone Hl111, BioLegend), anti-CD62L (clone DREG-56, BioLegend), anti-CD44 (clone IM7, BioLegend), anti-CXCR5 (clone 2G8, BD Pharmigen), anti-CCR7 (Clone 4B12, ThermoFisher) anti CXCR4 (Clone 2B11, Invitrogen). TRITC-Phalloidin (Thermo Fischer, Scientific), Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fischer, Scientific), murine CXCL12 and CXCL13 (PeproTech).Intravital microscopyWT host mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of xylazine (12.5mg/kg) and ketamine hydrochloride (125mg/kg) (Sanofi, Mexico-City, Mexico). The inguinal lymph node was then inoculated with 100渭l CXCL13 (25ng/ml) (PeproTech) to promote cell recruitment. One hour later, 1鈥壝椻€?07 Hoechst 33342-labeled, LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B cells were injected via the cannulated carotid artery. Venules of the inguinal lymph node were recorded using an intravital upright microscope (Axioscope, Model A1, Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with a 40鈥壝椻€塧nd 0.75 saline immersion objective (Zeiss). Videos and images were analyzed using ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD. USA) and Zen Blue Edition 2.5 software (Zeiss, Microscopy). The venules\' diameter, the number of adherent cells, the number of transmigrated cells, and the cells\' velocity were measured using ImageJ. Cell flux, blood flow, and rolling velocity were analyzed by Zen Blue Edition 2.5 software (Zeiss, Microscopy). This methodology was carried out following a previously published protocol32.Microfluidic device fabrication and imagingMicrofluidic devices were fabricated by standard soft lithography techniques that have been described before43. Devices are made with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Sylgard 184, Dow Corning). The microfluidic device comprises two parallel chambers separated by 150渭m, each with a height of 15渭m, a width of500渭m, and a length of 5mm. A series of perpendicular microchannels connect both chambers with alternated widths of 5, 10, and 15渭m, and the same height as chambers allows cell migration from one chamber to the other. Independent inlets and outlets are punched for each chamber, and media reservoirs are bonded to them to maintain cells viably and exchange solutions inside the device. Microfluidic devices were treated with Fibronectin before cell seeding to improve cell adhesion. LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocytes were seeded into microfluidic chambers by flowing a cell suspension (105 cells mL鈭?) into one of the chambers, waiting 10min for cells to adhere and then washing excess cells with fresh media. Subsequently, we applied CXCL13 or CXCL12 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) on the chamber\'s opposite side. B cell movement inside the microchannels was imaged for 30min at intervals of 20s in a confocal microscope. A minimum of 25 cells per chamber, per treatment condition, was analyzed.Migration-phenotype assayA Zigmond chamber (Neuroprobe, Gaithersburg, MD) was used to quantify the migratory phenotype. Briefly, 1鈥壝椻€?06 LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocytes from WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> were suspended in 0.5ml RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum immediately plated onto glass coverslips. The glass coverslips were previously coated with Fibronectin (2.5渭g/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich) or Poly-l-Lysine (Sigma-Aldrich), and the cells were incubated 30min at 37掳C and 5% CO2 to allow attachment. The coverslips, with the cells attached, were gently washed with PBS. One of the grooves in the Zigmond chamber was filled with supplemented medium (鈭?/span>70 渭l), and the other with CXCL13 (2.5 渭g/渭l) dissolved in the supplemented medium. Subsequently, cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 掳C and 5% CO2 to allow sensing of the CXCL13 gradient. Migration tracks of at least 50 activated lymphocytes of WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> mice, in three independent experiments, were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). This methodology was carried out following a previously published protocol21.Membrane-projections assay1鈥壝椻€?06 LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated B lymphocytes from WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> mice were suspended in 0.5ml RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum immediately plated onto glass coverslips coated with Fibronectin (2.5渭g/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were incubated one h at 37掳C and 5% CO2 to allow adhesion. Subsequently, cells were fixed and stained with TRITC-Phalloidin for 20min. At least 50 activated B lymphocytes of WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup> mice, in three independent experiments, were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). This methodology was carried out following a previously published protocol21.Trans-well assay1.5鈥壝椻€?04 LPS鈥?鈥塈L-4 activated WT and Myo1g鈭?鈭?/sup>
B lymphocytes were placed in the upper compartment of 5渭m pore-trans-well chamber (Corning) in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) without Fetal Calf Serum (FCS). Ten minutes before seeding the cell suspension in the top compartment, we added FCS or CXCL12 (100ng/ml) to the lower well. The assembled chamber was incubated 4h at 37掳C and 5% CO2. After incubation, the cells in the lower compartment were counted, and we calculated the percentage of migrating cells from the number of initial cells seeded in the top chamber.Statistical analysisData are presented as the arithmetic mean with standard deviations; Student鈥檚 t-test was used for evaluating statistical differences. A p-value of鈥?lt;鈥?.05 was considered statically significant. The p values are represented as *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05, **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01, ***p鈥?lt;鈥?.001, and ****p鈥?lt;鈥?.0001, and the number of samples or cells (n) used are mentioned in each figure legend. This analysis was carried out following a previously published protocol21. Raw data used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. References1.Gowans, J. L. The recirculation of lymphocytes from blood to lymph in the rat. J. Physiol. 146, 54鈥?9 (1959).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 2.Gauguet, J. M., Bonasio, R. Von Andrian, U. H. High endothelial venules. Endothelial Biomedicine (Elsevier, 2007).3.Gonz谩lez-Amaro, R. S谩nchez-Madrid, F. Cell adhesion molecules: Selectins and integrins. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 19, 389鈥?29 (1999).PubMed聽Google Scholar聽 4.Von Andrian, U. H. Mempel, T. R. Homing and cellular traffic in lymph nodes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 867鈥?78 (2003).Article聽Google Scholar聽 5.Hughes, C. E. Nibbs, R. J. B. A guide to chemokines and their receptors. FEBS J. 285, 2944鈥?971 (2018).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 6.Mcheik, S. et al. Coexpression of CCR7 and CXCR4 during B cell development controls CXCR4 responsiveness and bone marrow homing. Front. Immunol. 10, (2019).7.Park, S. M. et al. Migratory cues controlling B-lymphocyte trafficking in human lymph nodes. Immunol. Cell Biol. 99, 49鈥?4 (2021).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 8.F枚rster, R. et al. A putative chemokine receptor, BLR1, directs B cell migration to defined lymphoid organs and specific anatomic compartments of the spleen. Cell 87, 1037鈥?047 (1996).Article聽Google Scholar聽 9.Bowman, E. P. et al. Developmental switches in chemokine response profiles during B cell differentiation and maturation. J. Exp. Med. 191, 1303鈥?317 (2000).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 10.Pontes, B. et al. Membrane tension controls adhesion positioning at the leading edge of cells. J. Cell Biol. 216, 2959鈥?977 (2017).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 11.Batchelder, E. L. et al. Membrane tension regulates motility by controlling lamellipodium organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11429鈥?1434 (2011).ADS聽 CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 12.Diz-Mu帽oz, A., Fletcher, D. A. Weiner, O. D. Use the force: Membrane tension as an organizer of cell shape and motility. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 47鈥?3 (2013).Article聽Google Scholar聽 13.Maravillas-Montero, J. L. Santos-Argumedo, L. The myosin family: unconventional roles of actin-dependent molecular motors in immune cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 91, 35鈥?6 (2012).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 14.McIntosh, B. B. Ostap, E. M. Myosin-I molecular motors at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 129, 2689鈥?695 (2016).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 15.Berg, J. S., Powell, B. C. Cheney, R. E. A millennial myosin census. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 780鈥?94 (2001).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 16.Gir贸n-P茅rez, D. A., Piedra-Quintero, Z. L. Santos-Argumedo, L. Class I myosins: Highly versatile proteins with specific functions in the immune system. J. Leukoc. Biol. 105, 973鈥?81 (2019).Article聽Google Scholar聽 17.L贸pez-Ortega, O. et al. Myo1g is an active player in maintaining cell stiffness in B-lymphocytes. Cytoskeleton 73, 258鈥?68 (2016).Article聽Google Scholar聽 18.Dart, A. E., Tollis, S., Bright, M. D., Frankel, G. Endres, R. G. The motor protein myosin 1G functions in Fc R-mediated phagocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 125, 6020鈥?029 (2012).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 19.Patino-Lopez, G. et al. Myosin 1G is an abundant class I myosin in lymphocytes whose localization at the plasma membrane depends on its ancient divergent pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (Myo1PH). J. Biol. Chem. 285, 8675鈥?686 (2010).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 20.Maravillas-Montero, J. L., L贸pez-Ortega, O., Pati帽o-L贸pez, G. Santos-Argumedo, L. Myosin 1g regulates cytoskeleton plasticity, cell migration, exocytosis, and endocytosis in B lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 44, 877鈥?86 (2014).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 21.L贸pez-Ortega, O. Santos-Argumedo, L. Myosin 1g contributes to CD44 adhesion protein and lipid rafts recycling and controls CD44 capping and cell migration in B lymphocytes. Front. Immunol. 8, (2017).22.Olety, B., W盲lte, M., Honnert, U., Schillers, H. B盲hler, M. Myosin 1G (Myo1G) is a haematopoietic specific myosin that localises to the plasma membrane and regulates cell elasticity. FEBS Lett. 584, 493鈥?99 (2010).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 23.L贸pez-Giral, S. et al. Chemokine receptors that mediate B cell homing to secondary lymphoid tissues are highly expressed in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphomas with widespread nodular dissemination. J. Leukoc. Biol. 76, 462鈥?71 (2004).Article聽Google Scholar聽 24.Galarza, S., Kim, H., Atay, N., Peyton, S. R. Munson, J. M. 2D or 3D? How cell motility measurements are conserved across dimensions in vitro and translate in vivo. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 5, (2020).25.Gough, N. R. Moving in 2D versus 3D. Sci. Signal. 3, ec274鈥揺c274 (2010).26.Jacobelli, J. et al. Confinement-optimized three-dimensional T cell amoeboid motility is modulated via myosin IIA-regulated adhesions. Nat. Immunol. 11, 953鈥?61 (2010).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 27.G茅rard, A. et al. Detection of rare antigen-presenting cells through T cell-intrinsic meandering motility, mediated by Myo1g. Cell 158, 492鈥?05 (2014).Article聽Google Scholar聽 28.Head, B. P., Patel, H. H. Insel, P. A. Interaction of membrane/lipid rafts with the cytoskeleton: Impact on signaling and function: Membrane/lipid rafts, mediators of cytoskeletal arrangement and cell signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1838, 532鈥?45 (2014).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 29.Gauthier, N. C., Masters, T. A. Sheetz, M. P. Mechanical feedback between membrane tension and dynamics. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 527鈥?35 (2012).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 30.Santos-Argumedo, L., Maravillas-Montero, J. L. L贸pez-Ortega, O. Class I myosins in B-cell physiology: Functions in spreading, immune synapses, motility, and vesicular traffic. Immunol. Rev. 256, 190鈥?02 (2013).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 31.Raucher, D. Sheetz, M. P. Cell spreading and lamellipodial extension rate is regulated by membrane tension. J. Cell Biol. 148, 127鈥?36 (2000).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 32.Gir贸n-P茅rez, D. A., Vadillo, E., Schnoor, M. Santos-Argumedo, L. Myo1e modulates the recruitment of activated B cells to inguinal lymph nodes. J. Cell Sci. 133, jcs235275 (2020).33.Maravillas-Montero, J. L., Gillespie, P. G., Patino-Lopez, G., Shaw, S. Santos-Argumedo, L. Myosin 1c participates in B cell cytoskeleton rearrangements, is recruited to the immunologic synapse, and contributes to antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 187, 3053鈥?063 (2011).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 34.Yoshida, H. et al. Effect of the interaction between fibronectin and VLA-4 on the proliferation of human B cells, especially a novel human B-cell line, OPM-3. Br. J. Haematol. 103, 804鈥?12 (1998).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 35.Kozlov, M. M. Chernomordik, L. V. Membrane tension and membrane fusion. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 33, 61鈥?7 (2015).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 36.Heissler, S. M. Sellers, J. R. Kinetic adaptations of myosins for their diverse cellular functions. Traffic 17, 839鈥?59 (2016).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 37.B枚ttcher, R. T. F盲ssler, R. Membrane tension drives ligand-independent integrin signaling. EMBO J. 33, 2439鈥?441 (2014).Article聽Google Scholar聽 38.Giannone, G., M猫ge, R. M. Thoumine, O. Multi-level molecular clutches in motile cell processes. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 475鈥?86 (2009).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 39.Diz-Mu帽oz, A. et al. Membrane tension acts through PLD2 and mTORC2 to limit actin network assembly during neutrophil migration. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002474 (2016).Article聽Google Scholar聽 40.Loh, J. et al. An acute decrease in plasma membrane tension induces macropinocytosis via PLD2 activation. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs232579 (2019).41.Riggi, M. et al. TORC2 controls endocytosis through plasma membrane tension. J. Cell Biol. 218, 2265鈥?276 (2019).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 42.Okada, T. et al. Chemokine requirements for b cell entry to lymph nodes and Peyer鈥檚 patches. J. Exp. Med. 196, 65鈥?5 (2002).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 43.Gonzalez-Suarez, A. M., Pena-Del Castillo, J. G., Hern谩ndez-Cruz, A. Garcia-Cordero, J. L. Dynamic generation of concentration- and temporal-dependent chemical signals in an integrated microfluidic device for single-cell analysis. Anal. Chem. 90, 8331鈥?336 (2018).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 Download referencesAcknowledgementsWe thank Dr. H茅ctor Romero-Ram铆rez and Dr. Hilda Vargas-Robles for their technical advice at different stages of this work, M. V. Z. Ricardo Gaxiola Centeno and Tec. Victor Manuel Garc铆a G贸mez for their excellent technical assistance in the animal facility and Carlos Emilio Miguel Rodriguez for his help to format the figures. JLGC acknowledges funding from CONACyT, Grants No. CB-256097, ERC-297690 and CB-286368. DCZ was supported by CONACYT scholarships 632703. LSA acknowledges funding from CONACyT, Grant No. CB-255053.Author informationAuthor notesThese authors contributed equally: D. Cruz-Z谩rate, O. L贸pez-Ortega and D. A. Gir贸n-P茅rez.AffiliationsDepartamento de Biomedicina Molecular, Centro de Investigaci贸n y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Polit茅cnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Av. Instituto Polit茅cnico Nacional 2508, San Pedro Zacatenco, 07360, Mexico City, MexicoD. Cruz-Z谩rate,聽O. L贸pez-Ortega,聽D. A. Gir贸n-P茅rez,聽M. Schnoor聽 聽L. Santos-ArgumedoUnidad Monterrey, Centro de Investigaci贸n y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Polit茅cnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Monterrey, NL, MexicoA. M. Gonzalez-Suarez聽 聽J. L. Garc铆a-CorderoDepartmento and Posgrado en Inmunologia, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas del Instituto Polit茅cnico Nacional (ENCB-IPN), Mexico City, MexicoD. Cruz-Z谩rateAuthorsD. Cruz-Z谩rateView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarO. L贸pez-OrtegaView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarD. A. Gir贸n-P茅rezView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarA. M. Gonzalez-SuarezView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarJ. L. Garc铆a-CorderoView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarM. SchnoorView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarL. Santos-ArgumedoView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarContributionsD.C.Z., O.L.O., and D.A.G.P. performed experiments and analyzed data. D.C.Z. designed and drew the schematic illustration under L.S.A. supervision. A.M.G.S. fabricated and characterized the microfluidic device under J.L.G.C. supervision. M.S. supervised intravital experiments. D.C.Z. and L.S.A. wrote the manuscript with contributions by all authors. L.S.A. supervised the study and provided financial support.Corresponding authorCorrespondence to L. Santos-Argumedo.Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Additional informationPublisher\'s noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary Information Supplementary Video 1. Supplementary Video 2. Supplementary Video 3. Supplementary Video 4. Supplementary Information 1. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article\'s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article\'s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and PermissionsAbout this articleCite this articleCruz-Z谩rate, D., L贸pez-Ortega, O., Gir贸n-P茅rez, D.A. et al. Myo1g is required for efficient adhesion and migration of activated B lymphocytes to inguinal lymph nodes. Sci Rep 11, 7197 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85477-yDownload citationReceived: 16 October 2020Accepted: 18 February 2021Published: 30 March 2021DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85477-y CommentsBy submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter 鈥?what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.